The Medical Marijuana SCAM: Update 1996, Lapey

Janet D. Lapey, M.D
Concerned Citizens For Drug Prevention,Inc.
PO Box 2078. Hanover, MA 02339
617-826-5598

WHY ISN'T MARIJUANA A MEDICINE?

By federal law a substance may not be marketed as a medicine until it has scientifically been shown to be safe and effective. Marijuana has never been shown scientifically to be safe or effective for the treatment of any condition.

WHY MUST A SUBSTANCE BE SHOWN TO BE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?

Before 1906, the prevailing philosophy was "caveat emptor' (let the buyer beware), as many unscrupulous doctors peddled unlabeled medicines which did more harm than good. These "snake oil" salesmen's potions often contained addictive substances, such as marijuana, cocaine, or morphine, and many people unwittingly became addicts. In order to protect the public from such scams and quackery, laws were enacted which ensure that no substance is marketed as medicinal until proven to be both safe and effective: the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act required that ingredients be listed on the label; then the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 gave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to require that manufacturers prove their products' safety. In 1962 this requirement was expanded to include both safety and efficacy.

IF THE INGREDIENTS OF MARIJUANA WERE LISTED ON THE LABEL, WHAT WOULD THIS LIST INCLUDE?

Marijuana is not a pure substance but is an unstable, varying, complex mixture of over 400 chemicals, many of which are harmful substances which have not been well-studied either alone or in combination with each other. New harmful chemical components of marijuana are still being discovered. When smoked, marijuana produces over 2000 chemicals, including hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, carbon monoxide, acetaldehyde, acetone, phenol, cresol, naphthalene, and well-known carcinogens such as benz(a) pyrene, benz(a)anthracene, benzene, and nitrosamines. Many of these cancer-causing substances are present in higher concentrations in marijuana smoke than in tobacco smoke.2

WHAT ARE THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF MARIJUANA?

Marijuana is addictive; it adversely affects the immune system," leads to the use of other drugs, such as cocaine;" it causes cancer, including cancer of the lungs, mouth, throat, lip, and tongue. Marijuana also causes respiratory diseases and mental disorders, such as schizophrenia and other psychoses, depression, panic attacks, hallucinations, paranoia, hostility, depersonalization, flashbacks, decreased cognitive performance, disconnected thought, delusions and impaired memory. Since marijuana impairs coordination and judgment, it is a major cause of accidents. Babies born to women who smoke rnarijuana during pregnancy have an increased incidence of leukemia, low birth weight," and other abnormalities.

HOW 1S A DRUG APPROVED AS A MEDICINE?

The process by which drugs are approved begins with studies of their chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology. Interchemical reactions must be known and reproducible and dosages must be measurable with exactitude. After a potential medicine is tested in animals, there are several required phases of testing for safety and efficacy in healthy human volunteers and later in patients. These clinical trials must be carefully controlled and conducted by qualified scientists.

HAVE THERE BEEN ANY STUDIES ON MARIJUANA AS A MEDICINE?

Although marijuana continues to be available for research, over 12,000 scientific studies of marijuana have been published, and the drug has never been shown to be safe of effective for the treatment of any condition. In June 1991, the U.S. Public Health Service ordered a study of this issue by scientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The report, issued in March 1992, concluded that scientific studies have never shown marihjuana to be safe or effective as medicine and that there are better, safer drugs available for all conditions considered. The National Eye institute reported that the intraocular pressure lowering action of marijuana is not effective enough to prevent optic nerve damage from glaucoma and that "there is no scientifically verifiable evidence that marijuana or its derivatives are safe and effective in the treatment of glaucoma. " The National Cancer Institute reported that newer antiemetic agents such as ondansetron have been shown to be more useful than THC as a first line therapy. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders reported that no studies have shown marijuana to have beneficial effects on patients with multiple sclerosis. The National Institute of Dental Research reported that there have been no controlled studies which substantiate claims of marijuana's anti-pain effects. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease reported that the many carcinogens in marijuana smoke would be a health hazard for patients with comprised immune systems.

WHY IS MARIJUANA A SCHEDULE 1 DRUG?

A schedule 1 drug, such as LSD, is a drug which is highly abusable with no medicinal value. A Schedule II drug, such as cocaine, is also highly abusable, but has limited medicinal use. In 1972, the National Organisation for the reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML, a pro-marijuana legalisation group, and related organizations commenced litigation against the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in an attempt to reschedule marijuana from schedule I to schedule II. On February 18th, 1994 the U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C Circuit) ruled in favor of the DEA. The Court noted that the pro-marijuana parties, which included physicians connected to NORML, relied on non-scientific anecdotal testimonials. On the other hand, numerous highly qualified experts testified that marijuana's medicinal value has never been proven in sound scientific studies. In addition to the NIH, the FDA, the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and the American Glaucoma Society have all stated that marijuana has never shown to be safe or effective as medicine. Thus marijuana remains a Schedule I drug: highly abusable, with no medicinal use.

WHAT IS THE THC PILL AND WHY IS IT SCHEDULE II?

A synthetic form of delta-9tetrahydrocannabinol, THC, the main psychoative ingredient of marijuana, was approved by the FDA in 1985 as an anti-nausea agent for cancer chemotherapy patients who had failed to respond to other drugs. In 1992 it was approved as an appetite stimulant for patients with AIDS Wasting Syndrome. Synthetic THC ("Marinol") is available by prescription in pill form and is a Schedule II drug: highly abusable, with limited medical use. Unlike marijuana, Marinol fits the definition of a modern pharmaceutical in that it is a stable, well defined, pure substance in quantified dosage form. The medical use of THC (Marinol) is very restricted because of harmful side effects, such as addiction and mental disorders, which are dose-related, as noted in the Physicians' Desk Reference. Fortunately, newer, better anti emetic medications have been developed recently. Only a very low dose of Marinol is recommended for appetite stimulation, since larger doses increase adverse effects without increasing efficacy. Smoking marijuana produces higher plasma THC levels than are obtained when THC is taken in pill form, and therefore these harmful side effects are greater.

WHY DO SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT MARIJUANA HAS MEDICAL BENEFITS?

Due to a placebo effect, a patient may erroneously believe a drug is helpful when it is not. This is especially true of addictive, mind-altering drugs like marijuana. Therefore, when a patient anecdotally reports a drug to have medicinal value, this must be followed by objective scientific studies. For instance, in 1990, Dr J P Frankel conducted a scientific study of the effect of smoked marijuana on his patients with Parkinson's Disease because one of the patients had claimed the drug to be beneficial. Dr Frankel's research showed that the drug did not improve the symptoms of Parkinson's Disease in any patient, including the patient who had originally believed it useful. Similarly, anecdotal reports had claimed that marijuana caused improvements in multiple sclerosis. However, a scientifically-controlled 1994 study by Dr. H.S Greenberg showed that smoking marijuana makes the symptoms of multiple sclerosis worse. The situation is similar to an athlete believing that he is performing better under the influence of a drug when in actuality his performance is worse!

WHAT GROUPS ARE TRYING TO CLAIM THAT MARIJUANA IS A MEDICINE?

Just as there is a powerful tobacco lobby, there is a well-funded marijuna lobby which consists of groups, such as the National Association for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) , which aim to legalize marijuana. In 1979, Keith Stroup, NORML's founder, told an Emory University audience that they would be using the issue of medicinal marijuana as a red herring to give marijuana a good name. The tobacco industry also promoted cigarettes as medicine until the Federal Trade Commission halted the practice in 1955. "Camels" were said to prevent fatigue and aid digestion, and "Kools" were said to prevent the common cold. Currently, NORML backs state and federal "medicinal marijuana" bills which aim to bypass our consumer protection laws. The tobacco industry similarly tries to undermine the FDA.

DID THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ADVOCATE MARIJUANA AS MEDICINE?

No. There was an opinion piece in that journal written by Dr Lester Grinspoon, the psychiatrist who is chairman of the board of NORML. Grinspoon is a long-time advocate of drug legalization. His book, Marijuana, the Forbidden Medicine, promotes marijuana for almost any condition, including pain, itching, menstrual cramps, asthma, insomnia, depression, and other psychiatric conditions which marijuana is actually known to cause. The book downplays marijuana's harmfulness, referring to its addictive and gateway properties as a "hoary myth" (p.158). It was similar misinformation from Grinspoon downplaying the harmful effects of cocaine which was pinpointed by many experts as causing the nation's cocaine epidemic. On th NBC Nightly News, June 20,1995, Grinspoon said "marijuana is much safer than aspirin". This is not true.

WHAT WAS THE FEDERAL COMPASSIONATE USE PROGRAM?

the late seventies, pro marijuana activists pressured the federal government into providing marijuana cigarettes as "medicine" for conditions they claimed it benefited. Following the NIH report, the Bush Administration stopped accepting new customers for the governmental marijuana hand-out program in 1992. The Clinton Administration reviewed the policy and came to the same conclusion in July 1994.It was determined that it is not compassionate to pass out drugs which do more harm than good. For instance, studies show that HIV positive smokers progress to full blown AIDS twice as fast as non-smokers, and HIV positive marijuana smokers have an increased incidence of bacterial pneumonia compared to non-marijuana smokers. Most of the persons who received government-supplied marijuana died, and their deaths could have been accelerated by smoking marijuana. No scientific studies were ever carried out.

SUMMARY: In the nation's rush towards deregulation, we must not forget that government has a very crucial role to play in protecting the public from the modern day snake oil salesman. Those who aim to legalize marijuana are preying upon our most vulnerable citizens: the sick and the dying. We should learn by the history of tobacco that addictive dangerous drugs wreak great harm upon society when they manage to escape FDA regulation. It is not compassionate to promote drugs as "medicine" which have never been scientifically shown to be safe or effective.

    1. Yamamoto I etal. Pharm Biochem Behav 40: 465 469, 1991.
    2. Huber G. Pharm Biochem Behav 40:630,1991.
    3. Gold MS. Marijuana, NY:Plenum Medical Book Co.,p.227,1989.
    4. Spector S et al. Adv Exp Med Bio 288:47-56,1991.
    5. Djeu J et al. Adv Exp Med Bio 288: 57-62,1991.
    6. Watzl B et al.Adv Exp Med Bio 288: 63-70,1991.
    7. Cabral GA et al. Adv Exp Med Bio 288:93-105,1991.
    8. Kleber HD. J Clin Psych 49:2 (Suppl), p 3-6,1988.
    9. Donald PJ Otolaryn Head & Neck Surg 94:517-521, 1986.
    10. Ferguson RP et al. JAMA 261:41-42, 1989.
    11. Taylor FM, South Med J 81:1213-1216,1988.
    12. Donald PJ. Adv Exp Med Bio 288:33-46,1991.
    13. Tashkin DP. West J Med 158:635-637,1993.
    14. Polen MR et al West J Med 158:596-601.1993
    15. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV)May 1994. Schwartz RH Pediatric Clinics of NorthAmerica 34:305-317,1987 Cherek DR et.al. Psychopharmacology 111:163-168,1993 Andreasson S et al. Lancet 2:1483-1485,1987 Schwartz RH et al. Am J Dis Child 143:1214-1219,1989
    16. Soderstrom CA et al. Archives of Surg 123: 733-737,1988 Williams AF et al. 100:19-25,1985 Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board Report, Washington DC Feb.5,1990 Brookoff D et al. New Eng.J Med 331: 518-522,1994 Leirer VO et al. Aviat Space Environ Med. 62:221-227,1991
    17. Robison LL et al. Cancer, 63:1904-1910,1989
    18. Zuckerman B et al. New Eng J Med 320:762-768,1989
    19. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 84:475April 1 1992
    20. Federal Register 54: 53783, December 29,1989 Federal Register 57:10499,March 26,1992
    21. Physicians Desk Reference Medical Ecomomics Company,Oradell,NJ.1996
    22. Frankel JP,Hughes A. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 53:436 1990
    23. Greenberg HS et al. Clin Pharm & Ther 55::324-328,1994
    24. Emory Wheel February 1979.
    25. Ecanbarger W. The Philadelphia Inquirer, November 17,1991
    26. Grinspoon L,Bakalar JB, Drug Dependence. In:Kaplan HI et al eds.Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry,3rd Ed.,Baltimore;Williams & Wilkins,1980.
    27. Gawin FH, Ellinwood EH.New Eng J Med 318:1173-1182,1988. Kleber HD,op.cit
    28. Nieman RB et al AIDS 7:705-710,1993.
    29. AIDS weekly,p 19, June 28,1993